3:24-cv-04722 | N.D. California
Plaintiff
MUSK
57%
vs
Defense
ALTMAN
43%
Strongest claim (Unjust Enrichment / Quasi-Contract) - 4-Model Consensus
Model Predictions
GPT-5.2
Musk Wins
Strongest Claim
55%
Avg Claim Probability
38%
Gemini 2 Flash
Altman Wins
Strongest Claim
48%
Avg Claim Probability
35%
Grok 4.1
Musk Wins
Strongest Claim
60%
Avg Claim Probability
36%
Claude Opus 4.5
Musk Wins
Strongest Claim
65%
Avg Claim Probability
28%
Claim by Claim Probabilities
Consensus
Order
GPT-5.2
Gemini
Grok
Claude
#9
Unjust Enrichment / Quasi-Contract
57%
Consensus
View analysis →
#15
Declaratory Relief
51%
Consensus
View analysis →
#11
California UCL (Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200)
36%
Consensus
View analysis →
#2
Constructive Fraud
35%
Consensus
View analysis →
#3
Aiding and Abetting Fraud
34%
Consensus
View analysis →
#7
Breach of Implied-in-Fact Contract
34%
Consensus
View analysis →
#8
Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith
34%
Consensus
View analysis →
#12
California False Advertising (Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500)
34%
Consensus
View analysis →
#1
Promissory Fraud
32%
Consensus
View analysis →
#6
Breach of Express Contract
32%
Consensus
View analysis →
#10
Lanham Act False Advertising
31%
Consensus
View analysis →
#14
Tortious Interference with Contract
30%
Consensus
View analysis →
#13
Aiding and Abetting Breach of Fiduciary Duty
27%
Consensus
View analysis →
#5
RICO Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 1962(d))
26%
Consensus
View analysis →
#4
RICO Violations (18 U.S.C. § 1962(c))
23%
Consensus
View analysis →